Islamiq.sg

FAQ003: Basic Guidelines & Restrictions

Labels:
Bismillah wal-hamdulillah wa-salatu wa-salam 'ala Rasulillah, amma ba'd.

Basic Guidelines

- Please access previous articles by using the keyword list or the search box so as to avoid enquiring about topics that has already been posted

- Please follow the general Islamic guidelines of conduct when posting comments on articles

- Please ensure that your comments are easily readable (proper spelling, punctuation, capitalisation & paragraphing) and related to the topic.

- Please be reminded that IslamIQ.sg has a high hit rate of more than a thousand times per week, hence the comments you post will be read both by Muslims and non-Muslims alike (including government personnel)


Restrictions

- Comments that belittle or insult articles on IslamIQ.sg or comments posted by other readers will not be tolerated.

- Spamming the website by posting multiple comments that has little value will not be tolerated.

- Comments that are insulting towards any other person(s), groups, organizations or fellow readers will be removed. Keep the criticism constructive.

- Comments that are political in nature such as those related to the crusades in Iraq & Afghanistan, the illegal occupation of Palestine and terrorism/jihadism are extremely sensitive topics. Do refrain from such comments and err on the side of caution.

- Any comments deemed contradictory to Islamic teachings will be removed.

- Any links posted to websites that has objectionable content will be removed.

- Comments that promote sales of products, online petitions, requests for money or donations will be removed.

- Comments that imply support of terrorists/terrorism will be removed.

- Comments that promote person(s), groups or organizations linked to terrorists/terrorism such as al-Ikhwanul Muslimun, Hizbut Tahrir and Jemaah Islamiyah will be removed.

- Do not copy & paste fatawa or articles into the comment area. Post a few lines of extract or a link to the full fatawa or article. If you have authored the article yourself, then you probably need your own blog.

- Please direct questions & concerns to IslamIQ.sg@gmail.com

- Questions dealing with why comments were removed are best sent via email, not within the comment area.

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
These basic guidelines and restrictions were drawn up to ensure this website's longevity and continued existence. With its implementation, past comments that did not conform to these guidelines and restrictions have been removed with immediate effect.
 
We would like to thank all the past contributors and hope they will continue to contribute constructively to IslamIQ.sg.
3 comments:

BENCANA LIDAH
Secara umum, bencana yang ditimbulkan oleh lidah ada dua. Yaitu berbicara batil (kerusakan, sia-sia), dan diam dari al-haq yang wajib diucapkan.

Abu 'Ali ad-Daqqâq rahimahullah (wafat 412 H) berkata:

الْمُتَكَلِّمُ بِالْبَاطِلِ شَيْطَانٌ نَاطِقٌ وَالسَّاكِتُ عَنِ الْحَقِّ شَيْطَانٌ أَخْرَسُ

"ORANG YANG BERBICARA DENGAN KEBATHILAN ADALAH SETAN YANG BERBICARA, SEDANGKAN ORANG YANG DIAM DARI KEBENARAN ADALAH SETAN BISU" -

Disebutkan oleh Ibnul-Qayyim dalam ad-Dâ' wad-Dawâ`, Tahqîq: Syaikh 'Ali bin Hasan al-Halabi, Penerbit Dar Ibnil-Jauzi, hlm. 155.

Orang yang berbicara dengan kebatilan ialah setan yang berbicara, ia bermaksiat kepada Allah Ta'ala. Sedangkan orang yang diam dari kebenaran ialah setan yang bisu, ia juga bermaksiat kepada Allah Ta'ala.
Seperti seseorang yang bertemu dengan orang fasik, terang-terangan melakukan kemaksiatan di hadapannya, dia berkata lembut, tanpa mengingkarinya, walau di dalam hati.
Atau melihat kemungkaran, dan dia mampu merubahnya, namun dia membisu karena menjaga kehormatan pelakunya, atau orang lain, atau karena tak peduli terhadap agama.


السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركات

While the guidelines are indeed for our common good, some questions need to be addressed :

1. Do our religious leaders realise and appreciate the various heartfelt comments from the public so that they can gauge from such barometers the necessary steps to be taken to address such issues head-on, instead of creating ambiguity or diversion from it merely to maintain the status-quo ?

2. To deem some comments as insulting can also be unobjective, especially when such strong-worded comments are meant to vent one's strong feelings about some clear-cut false beliefs and practices being promoted with impunity at whose expenses ?

3. Is there any MUIS code of Advertising and Teaching Practice akin to The Singapore Code of Advertising Practice that states that "advertisements should not EXPLOIT the public or mislead them with inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration and omission." - Straits Times 7 Jan 2011 pg C13 - so that such exaggerated and offending advertisement by one travel agency to promote his Haj package by inducing the ummah with 'free gifts of ZamZam drinks that were recited Khatam AlQuran 600 thousand times' can be taken to task ?

4. Are the relevant authorities feeling invinciible and never admit they are wrong, but instead insist that anyone who disagrees is acting against them ?

5. With all due respect to the relevant authorities' genuine care and effective representative of the Muslim affairs in Spore, are they losing touch with the religious pulse on the ground that are getting more well-informed ?

6. Isn't each of us obligated to act or speak up within his own limitation to correct a situation, or at least refute it in silence instead of adopting a if-u-cannot-beat-them-then-join-them stance, or worse is to become setan bisu ?

7. Its a pity if those who criticise are accused of creating divisions among the ummah, or accused of jealousy or nursing some grievance against the relevant authorities (RA), because this is not about pro or anti RA, but about preserving the sanctity of Islam, and of equal importance, about standing up for what is al-haq, Allahul Musta'an.

Barakallahu Feekum.


Barakallahu feek, akh binsajen.

First and foremost, I believe we agree on the following:
- to be upon a clear manhaj; the manhaj of the ahlussunnah
- to apply that manhaj in all matters
- to be consistent and persistent upon this clear manhaj

Holding one's tongue even when witnessing al-zulm is permissible, and even considered recommended in various instances. The fiqh in advising rulers (or the ruling Islamic body) is different from advising our close friends or laymen.

Ibn 'Umar and the remaining companions maintained obedience to 'Abd al-Mālik Ibn Marwan who was an oppressive ruler in his time.

"Obey them as long as they establish the prayer among you." (Bukhari & Muslim)

Imam an-Nawawi stated in Sharh Saheeh Muslim (12/229) that revolting (which means even inciting hatred) against rulers is haraam by the concensus of the Muslim scholars, even if they are sinful oppressors.

Misfortune has befallen some of our brothers who have applied the manhaj in some areas and neglected it in others, relying on mere intellect, emotions and the fatwas of groups that has gone astray such as the Ikhwanul Muslimun instead.

Shaykh Salih Ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Ali-Shaykh stated that one of the causes of the fitnah of the Khawarij is their refusal to refer back to the scholars (companions) and relying on their own deluded understandings instead. (Fitnah al-Khawarij)

Please forward further discussion on this matter via email. May Allah make us all steadfast on the true manhaj.


Amiin Ya Rabbal 'Alamiin.

Not only I agree, I'm also reminded of one do'a in Tafsir Ibn Katsir, Surah 41 Verse 30, as said by Al-Hasan :-

" Ya Allah, Engkau adalah Rabb kami, maka anugerahkanlah rezeki istiqamah kepada kami. "

Barakallahu Feekum Jamii'an.


Search IslamIQ.sg

Visitors:

Facebook

YouTube

Subscribe By Email


Facebook

YouTube

Subscribe By Email

www.fawaaid.sg